logo
  • Home
  • Services
    • Securities & Capital Markets Litigation
    • Capital Markets Consulting
  • Qualifications
    • Founding Principal
    • Other Senior Resources
    • Securities & Capital Markets Litigation
    • Capital Markets Consulting
  • Recommendations
  • Contact Us

Qualifications

  • Founding Principal
  • Other Senior Resources
  • Securities & Capital Markets Litigation
    • Characterization of Complex Structured Transactions for Tax Litigation
    • Securities Litigation - Misrepresentation of Risk
    • Securities Contract Litigation of an International Bank’s Loan & Collateral Practices
    • Large Securities Class Action Litigation
    • Tax Litigation focused on the Economic Substance
    • Drafted Request for Production of Documents for Structured Transactions at Financial Institutions
    • Trading Fraud Investigation
    • Provided Discovery Support for Large Securities Litigation
    • Criminal Tax Fraud Case Uncovered Economic Substance in the Structure of Investment Transactions
    • Analyzed Brokers Responsibilities Related to Commodity Transactions
    • Estimated Transactions Costs
    • Investigation of Fraud and Created Foundation
    • Securities Contract Disputed Estimation
    • Securities Litigation Recreated
  • Capital Markets Consulting

In a Large Securities Class Action Litigation, Evaluated Investment Banks Compliance with Internal Guidelines and Industry Practices

Activity:

  • Asked to provide an expert analysis of investment banks’ actions in a variety of securities and structured transactions. At issue were the investments banks’ knowledge and involvement in capital markets transactions that mislead investors and creditors. 
  • Our report analyzed a number of structured transactions in evaluating whether the investment banks acted improperly by determining if the investment banks followed their own internal processes, accepted industry practices and government regulations when entering into these structures.

Results:

  • The report concluded that in each of the structured transactions reviewed the investment banks did not followed their own internal processes, accepted industry practices and government regulations.
  • Moreover, the investment banks knew or should have known that structures were designed with the intent to mislead investors and creditors.  The investment banks ignored warning signs about the transactions intent and took precautions to distance themselves from potential exposure demonstrating knowledge about the integrity of the transactions.
  • The report and rebuttal report concluded the investment banks have a responsibility to follow regulatory and industry practices, and their own internal policies and not proceed with the analyzed transactions.
© 2012 CapMarket Consulting All rights reserved  Privacy Policy | Site Map | Email Us